fix

src/hermes_mcp/decision_engine.py

@@ -652,12 +652,11 @@ def _grid_fill_proximity(strategy: dict[str, Any], narrative_payload: dict[str,
 
 
 def _grid_fill_fights_breakout(grid_fill: dict[str, Any], breakout: dict[str, Any]) -> bool:
-    side = str(grid_fill.get("near_fill_side") or "")
-    bias = str(breakout.get("meso_bias") or breakout.get("micro_bias") or "")
-    if bias == "bullish":
-        return side == "sell"
-    if bias == "bearish":
-        return side == "buy"
+    """Whether a nearby grid fill is trading against the breakout move.
+
+    Current product requirement: grid proximity-to-fills should not block or trigger a handoff.
+    We only care about overall regime/tradeoff (fees vs staying), not which side happens to fill.
+    """
     return False
 
 
@@ -744,8 +743,7 @@ def _grid_switch_tradeoff(*,
         switch_benefit += 0.28
     if trend_ready:
         switch_benefit += 0.34
-    if fill_fights:
-        switch_benefit += 0.12
+    # Requirement: ignore nearby fill timing/side when estimating the stay-vs-switch tradeoff.
     if levels >= _trend_handoff_level_threshold(breakout):
         switch_benefit += 0.18
     switch_benefit += min(trend_score, 2.5) * 0.18
@@ -770,10 +768,7 @@ def _grid_switch_tradeoff(*,
         stay_cost += 0.1
     stay_cost += min(levels, 6.0) * 0.06
     stay_cost += min(open_order_count, 8) * 0.025
-    if near_fill:
-        stay_cost += 0.06
-    if fill_fights:
-        stay_cost += 0.18
+    # Requirement: ignore nearby fill timing/side when estimating the stay-vs-switch tradeoff.
     if not persistent:
         stay_cost += 0.12
     if adverse_notional_ratio >= 1.0: